TickerCompare

The best Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETFs

The Nasdaq 100 holds the 100 largest non-financial companies on the Nasdaq exchange, which in practice makes it a concentrated bet on US mega-cap tech. The UCITS funds below track it with near-identical results, so the choice comes down to fees and whether you want dividends reinvested or paid out. Expect bigger swings than an S&P 500 fund in both directions.

The short answer
  • Cheapest: CNDX at 0.30% a year (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF).
  • Hands-off pick: CNDX, dividends reinvested automatically.
  • For income: EQQQ, pays dividends out as cash.
#FundFee5Y (USD)
  • 1CNDX0.30%+99.4%
  • 2EQQQ0.30%+95.4%

Torn between the top two? See CNDX vs EQQQ head to head →

How this ranking works

Funds are ranked by annual fee (TER), cheapest first, using the same live dataset that powers the rest of TickerCompare; returns are total returns converted to USD and refresh throughout the trading day. Funds tracking the same index are near-interchangeable, so we treat cost as the main tiebreaker and flag dividend policy so you can match the fund to how you invest. This is educational information, not financial advice.

Interactive Brokers

Available on Interactive Brokers

Buy CNDX, EQQQ and thousands of other UCITS ETFs on Interactive Brokers.

Affiliate link. We may earn a referral commission, at no cost to you.

Frequently asked questions

Which is the cheapest Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF?

CNDX (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) is currently the cheapest at 0.30% a year. Because index funds tracking the same index hold the same things, the cheapest fund usually wins over time.

Which Nasdaq 100 ETF performed best over five years?

CNDX returned +99.4% in USD over the past five years. Performance differences between funds tracking the same index are tiny; fees and dividend policy matter more than past returns.

Should I pick the accumulating or distributing version?

CNDX reinvests dividends automatically (accumulating), while EQQQ pays them out as cash (distributing). Long-term investors who do not need the income usually pick accumulating for effortless compounding.

More rankings